'Treetop Forest\r'

'Statement of the problem The packaging squad at pate Forest is experiencing many problems. Their productivity is decreasing and affecting the rest of the de partments negatively. The unsupervised employees be s wishing off, argon non motivated and are adopting norms that are not fitted with the go with. Inventory cost and the adventure of damaged stocks are in addition increasing. The select of the look of the finished products is also decreasing, resulting in a vent in the market share in the industry, so being unable to compete with opposite companies.\r\n typesetters case of the problem Social loafing is get hold of the precipitate in productivity in the packaging team. This lean to withhold physical or intellectual run when performing a conclave task[1] represents the slacking behaviours of the employees in that department. The lack of supervision is also one of the master(prenominal) causes of intimately of the problems stated. The theme’s ropine ss is causing them to be bring on in similar manners, as analog tasks, even though the behaviours adopted are not in line with the norms of the rest of the caller-up (taking drawn-out breaks etc).\r\nBecause this department’s location is further than completely the other ones, the employees flavor isolated and excluded from the caller-out, causing their lack in motivation. The assemblage’s poor death penalty is causing an overstock which results in high stock-taking costs and risk of damaged stocks since they have to be stored outside ultimately causing the poor display of the finished product which affects the buyer’s decision. It canful be assumed that it is a big sort out due to the tasks that need to be performed, which affects the assort in many ways.\r\nIn larger groups, friendships develop, participation lowers and withdrawal increases resulting in process loss: a group transaction difficulty stemming from the problems of motivation and c oordination in larger groups. [2] Solutions and Consequences 1. To counteract the social loafing the company should: extend feelings of indispensability. Doing this within the group would motivate the employees. Increase performance feedback, so that employees will know how to improve themselves as well as knowing what they did well. Reward group performance. Pros: Highly motivated in what they are doing • They would feel belonging to the company since they would know what the company’s goals are. 2. To have a more structured environment, Treetop should hire and train a bracingborn supervisory program only for the packaging department. Pros: • This solution will step-down inventory costs and increase the production and quality of the finished products. • Effective communication between the other departments to balance the productivity levels Cons: • The salary and training of this new employee will increase the company’s costs. 3.\r\nTo bow dlerize the overtime costs, limits should be put on the mensuration of overtime hours an employee is exclusivelyowed to use, along with a deadline for a particular get along of products. Pros: • This would decrease the overtime salary costs • This would increase productivity due to the fixed goals. • This would decrease the extended break and lunch times. Cons: • Because these goals are imposed, the employees whitethorn be reluctant to achieve them. To avoid this situation, the goals could be discussed therefore increasing the probability of their achievement. Recommended Solution\r\nIt would be recommended to implant supervision since it is the main cause of all the problems the company is faced with and because of the many effects it would have on the situation. The group needs structure and a supervisor would therefore help resolve most problems. Implemented Solution Immediately, communication should be amend between the departments to stop the unbala nced productivity. This would resolve part of the inventory costs problems. Upper management should also put someone in charge of the packaging team. If costs of hiring a new supervisor are too high, an existing supervisor could be give more shifts.\r\nAlthough hiring and training costs are high, the company will benefit from this addition in the long-term. The new supervisor would counteract the social loafing the company is experiencing. The supervisor could be trained to focus on the motivation of his group (rewarding good performances etc). This supervisor is also the one who should limit the employees to a certain amount of overtime hours they are allowed to. The supervisor would reinforce the company’s norms, eventually eliminating the self-imposed ones in the group (longer breaks…). The supervisor would also promote group cohesiveness and a pleasant working environment.\r\nIn the in short term, upper management could host a skirmish or assembly between all dep artments to make them feel interrelated and important to the company. This could be a great motivation for the employees. In the long term, group evaluations could be necessary to measure the group’s performance and to see if the actions taken are solvent the problems. ________________________________________ [1] Johns,G, & Saks, A. M. (2008). Organizational Behaviour, 7th edition, Toronto: Addison-Wesley-Longman. [2] Johns,G, & Saks, A. M. (2008). Organizational Behaviour, 7th edition, Toronto: Addison-Wesley-Longman.\r\n'