Monday, January 14, 2019
History of Social Policy
1. Explain the meaning of the fol clinical burdening terms industrialisation urbanization public wellness problems and the implications for claim provisions The Industrial Revolution was a period from the 18th to the 19th century where major changes in agriculture, manufacturing, mining, and engineering had an extreme effect on the societys economic and heathenish conditions. Starting in the get together Kingdom, then consequently spreading passim Europe, North America, and ultimately the world.The Industrial Revolution marks a major turning point in history. Al roughly every feature of unremarkable life was influenced in some way. Most particularly, average income and population began to certify extraordinary sustained growth. This is known as urbanisation. Urbanisation is the increase in the proportion of the great unwashed living in towns and cities. Rapid urbanisation took channelize during this period of industrialisation, many people moved from rural to urban areas t o secure jobs in the rapidly expanding industries in many large towns and cities.It is estimated that 1/6 of the British population visited London during the 18th century, and the most adventurous and ch whollyenging stayed. This urbanisation had huge implications and publicationed in complex societal changes which had adverse cause on the public health of communities. Diseases like typhoid and cholera were common. An extravasation of cholera in 1848 killed 14,000 in London. This was cod to the housing shortages, sanitation problems, low standards of personal hygiene, polluted drinking water, exploitation of workers and widespread poverty.Great Britain in the nineteenth century was a great bastion of idiosyncraticism where that unsympathizing principle of the policy-making economists -laissez faire- dominated public opinion, and Parliament. The individualist theory of political sympathies holds that the position of state is to protect the liberty of individuals to act as th ey wish, as long as they do non infringe upon the liberties of separates. Although there has been increase debate over whether this age of -laissez faire gave way to an age of collectivism, This is the period regarded as the source for the widespread collectivism that would ollow. Collectivism At its root is the depression that a collective is to a greater extent(prenominal) than just individuals interacting together. It is the belief that the group is an entity itself, more grave than the sum of the individuals. Put simply by John F. Kennedy rent not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country. And that is exactly what happened, In 1875 state incumbrance meant that a public health act was passed. This implemented that all new residential construction had to hold wanderning water, and an innate drainage brass.Also the act meant that all towns had to commence pavements and street lights. Yet there was still alot that needed to be do which me ant more state intervention was necessary. The national insurance scheme introduced by the liberal authorities in 1911, gave most workers health insurance and unemployment benefits for workers in industries with high risks of unemployment. But by the 1920s and 1930s the economic depression and widespread unemployment meant that the national insurance scheme was paying out more that it recieved.Benefits were cut and a means test was imposed. This did not change a thing however, poverty was pervasive and particularly among the families of the unemployed. 2. Assess the relationship between laissez faire and ideas of upbeat and poverty in the 19th century. Give examples including reference to the miserable laws. The original people that believed in and encouraged laissez-faire were the physiocrats (political economists). The physiocrats were followers of the physiocrat groom of economic thought, and were in a way the predecessors of classical economists.Although some of their more renowned ideas were very backwards, like believing that only land (physical assets) produced revenue, they sure were the commencement to come up with the notion of laissez-faire. (or no government interference) In 1563 the poor of Britain were branded for the first time into deserving, and the undeserving. The elderly and the very young, the infirm, and families who on an irregular basis found themselves in financial difficulties due to a change in circumstance were considered deserving of kindly support.But people who often sullen to crime to make a living such as, highwaymen or pickpockets, unsettled workers who roamed the country looking for work, and individuals who begged for a living, were to be treated unsympathetically. The act of 1572 introduced the first necessary poor local poor law tax, an important flavor acknowledging that alleviating poverty was the accountability of local communities, in 1576 the concept of the workhouse was born, and in 1597 the locating of overseer of the poor was created. The great act of 1601 combined all the former acts and set the benchmark for the next two hundred years.The Poor Laws passed during the predominate of Queen Elizabeth played an essential role in the countrys welfare. They signalled important growth from private charity to welfare state, where the care and supervision of the poor was collective in law and integral to the management of each town, village and hamlet. In 1843, the newspaper The Economist was founded, and became an influential voice for laissez-faire capitalism. In retort to the Irish famine of 18461849, in which over 1. 5 million people died of starvation, they argued that for the government to supply surrender food for the Irish would violate graphic law.Clarendon, the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, wrote, I dont think there is an opposite law-makers in Europe that would disregard such suffering. Laissez-faire policy was never absolute in any nation, and at the end of the 19th ce ntury, European countries again took up some economic protectionism and interventionism. France for example, started cancelling its free trade agreements with other European countries in 1890. Germanys protectionism started (again) with a December 1878 letter from Bismarck, resulting in the conjure and rye tariff of 1879. 1929 was a crucial year across the globe.When the United States stock market crashed, ripples were felt across Europe. As hardship and peril walked hand-in-hand into the 1930s, they met increasing unemployment and poverty. As president of the United States, Franklin D. Roosevelt took action by implementing a new economic strategy in the New Deal. This model was the affirmative activism, experimentation, and interventionist reforms that the country so desperately needed at the time whilst the the States committed herself to companionable justice and firmly held the belief of government responsibility towards its citizens, the USSR praised socialism and raiseed c ommunism.The United Kingdom saw the action other global governments were taking, and decided to follow the lead. In 1935 Attlee became the new leader of the labor troupe. At that time the Conservative government feared the spread of communism from the Soviet Union to the rest of Europe. In 1940 Attlee joined the coalition government headed by Winston Churchill. He was virtually deputy Prime Minister although this post did not formally become his until 1942.It was afterwards claimed that during the Second World War Attlee worked as a restraining influence on some of Churchills wilder schemes The excavate ships company published the Beveridge Report (1942), the shellselling report (that) set out social programs to s meat the five giants Want, Disease, Ignorance, Squalor, and Idleness. In 1945 Herbert Morrison (who was defeated by Clement Attlee for the leaders of the jade Party in 1935) was given responsibility for drafting the Labour Party manifesto that included the blueprint s for the nationalization and welfare programmes. The Labour Party was a socialist party and proud of it. As a result, the Labour government established free medical care under a newly constituted National Health Service, created new arrangements of pensions, encourage emend teaching and housing, and sought to deliver on the unambiguous commitment to just employment. In 1945, the United Kingdom gave birth to the first modern welfare state. 3. How did the political ideology of the new right wing impact on social policies under Mrs Thatcher? What is a political ideology?Alcock (2003, p. 194, original emphasis) argues that ideology is a concept that refers to the systems of beliefs within which all individuals perceive all social phenomena. He goes on to stating that in this usage no one system of beliefs is more correct, or more privileged, than any other. Heywood (2003, p. 12) suggests, an ideology is a more or less coherent set of ideas that provides the basis for nonionised po litical action, whether this is intended to preserve, modify or overthrow the existing system of power.The new right, it is generally accepted that the political ideology of the New decent contains two interrelated but in any case sometimes contradictory strands of political thought neo-liberalism and neo-conservatism. The core elements of neo-liberalism are support for individualism, laissez faire and control government intervention in economy and society. Neo-liberals believe that individuals are rational and therefore the best judges of their own best nterests and that they should be allowed the utmost possible individual freedom to determine their own behavior musical theme only to the confinement that their behavior should not harm others. The core elements of neo-conservatism differ in several(prenominal) extols from those of neo-liberalism. Whereas classic liberals are all in favor of free individualistic decision making, conservatives put forward that this kind of indiv idualism is a recipe for anarchy and that individual freedom, can best be guaranteed via respect for tralatitious norms, values and institutions.They declare that traditional institutions and patterns of social behavior which cave in stood the test of time must founder done so because they have been socially beneficial which leads neo-Conservatives to support the maintenance or at most only gradual change in the existing social graze which implies support for traditional sources of authority, traditional patterns of social and economic inequality, traditional institutions and traditional values.They are therefore expected to be supporters of strong but throttle government, the Monarchy and the Aristocracy, the Church, the traditional family and traditional reproduction. Under the leadership of Mrs Thatcher the conservatives do it their duty to do away with socialism and to reduce the power of the trade unions. Thatchers government made changes to the N. H. S, by creating the internal market. This was down to the Griffiths reports (1983) which suggested that the N. H. S should be perish like a super market. Instead of meeting patients needs, trusts would be run in competition with one another for patients. Administration costs in the N. H. S in 1979 were approximately 6%. After the introduction of the internal market these costs had doubled to 12%. this shows that Thatcher had introduced inefficiencies as a result of outsourcing and duplication of work. However, Thatchers intended privatisation was never carried through completely due to the backlash from the public.Tebbit once described the N. H. S as the nearest thing in Britain to a national religion. The conservative government also contributed in making reforms to the state education system. The Conservatives 1979 Education Act withdraw the requirements introduced by previous Labor Governments that Local Authorities whose secondary schools were not currently organized on comprehensive lines must prepare plans for the novelty to comprehensive education.Also under the 1979 Act Local Authorities were communicate to place greater emphasis on parental choice in the allocation of school places although it has been suggested that in practice this requirement had only limited practical effects. The 1980 Education Act introduced an assisted Places Scheme which subsidized students who passed an conquer examination but whose parents had limited funds to be educated at private schools in the hope that this would enable these more able students to develop their talents more fully than would be possible in the state heavens of education.This policy is a sign of a Conservative belief that state schools were often incapable of developing the talents of the most gifted pupils and in effect provided a state subsidy to the private education sector which the Conservatives wished to support. An important reform was the 1986 Education Act. This abolished corporal punishment in state schools. separate than this the Thatcher lead conservative party made many more changes to the education system Under the terms of the 1988 Education Reform Act, the following education policies were introduced.A National Curriculum was introduced which was to be followed compulsorily in all mainstream state schools but remained optional for independent schools. The National Curriculum was before to contain 10 unequivocal subjects of which 3 English, Mathematics and Science were to be core subjects and 7 History, Geography, Technology, Music, Art, PE and a modern foreign language at come upon stages 3 and 4 were to be foundation subjects. Welsh was to be a Core Subject in Welsh -speaking schools and a foundation subject in Welsh non-Welsh speaking schools.RE was to be a compulsory basic subject in all schools although problems would arise surrounding the detailed nature of the RE curriculum which was to be primarily based around Christianity except where the ethnic/religious compositio n of the school population suggested that this was inappropriate. In conclusion Thatchers conservative party had an immense impact and made numerous reforms and changes whilst in government. After all she is not called a social policy expert (Clare Beckett The 20 Prime Ministers of the 20th Century) for nothing.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment