Rogerian Argument Outline

I. separate One Introduction exit/issue external intervention by the foreign committal and homo powers like the United States into the national affairs of warring nations is essential for national conflict resolution. Opposing view Warring nations should be responsible for their proclaim municipalated conflicts and image ways to resolve them. Others nations should limit their intervention to and the mediation of peace talks. Writers viewExternal military machine and diplomatic intervention has been the key to solving major civil conflicts and preventing realizable genocides in countries such as sierra Leone and Libya while people in countries such as Rwanda and currently in Syria endure the worst because of the slur eye or unwillingness to react to atrocities against humanity by the foreign community. Problem Key terms Intervention atrocities genocide mediation II. Paragraph Two abridgment of the Opposing Views Position main(prenominal) plosive speech sound A Each na tion moldiness be self-responsible for their domestic conflict and find ways to resolve it. master(prenominal) signal B The cost incurred in the form of lost military lives and equipment on the intervening nations is mostly in like manner much. The cost of funding these wars can easily get off of custody as conflicts tend to last longer than mostly anticipated. Main point C III. Paragraph Three line of Validity (Why their view must be valid, IV.Paragraph Four Summary of the Writers Position Main point A Innocent civilians in Nations such as Liberia and sierra Leone endured decades of war. Only after massive intervention by the international military commission were these conflicts resolved. The same can be said for Libya and currently in DR. Congo. Main point B However, the same cannot be said for countries such Rwanda or Bosnia where modern genocide occurred under the watch of the international committee. Main point CDespite all the daily reports and evidence coming from Syr ia, the international community is still undecided on which course of action to tackle to alleviate the pain and suffering of the innocent civilians. V. Paragraph Five Statement of Validity Context or specific circumstance(s) in which this view may be considered valid even though it is best to allow domestic conflicts to be self-resolved it is also in the interest of humanity that the international committee and nations such as the United States periodically intervene in conflicts that gets out of hand.VI. Paragraph Six Statement of Benefit(s) Even though it is right that domestic conflicts are best solved nationally, it is in the interest of the innocent and oppress that the international committee intervenes to enforce these solutions. VII. Paragraph Seven Conclusion Summary The international committee should intervene in escalating domestic conflicts to help in resolving. Common ground Compromise Proposed solution Positive, hopeful statement (Relate to how SL. pass yrs negoti ating till intervention. )