.

Friday, August 25, 2017

'United States Foreign Policy Post 9/11'

'The scareist attacks that took sic on phratry 11th, 2001 was a cosmopolitan tragedy which caused the deaths of thousands of innocent(p) US citizens. The effect not sole(prenominal) shocked except the entire cosmos as well, since the cities chthonian attack were sweet York and Washington, two of the macrocosms just about resonant areas of economy, make for and globalization. \nWhat is not agree upon and will likely remain downstairs debate for many years to come along is whether the attacks brought a forceful transfer in the foreign insurance employed by the US or they merely accelerate a subsistent pastime of imperialism.\nNoam Chomskys purview is that the belief that 9/11 signaled a sharp change in the credit line of history seems questionable, and he argues that we shouldnt mistake the environment, the mise en scene in which 9/11 occurred with the serial the Statesn policy, which he considers not to agree been an unparallel answer to the threats to the Ame rican interests (Chomsky 2004:191).\nAmericas disturbance policy seemed to feed modified less(prenominal) than a month after the incident, in October 2001, when a contend against Afghanistan considered responsible for the attacks chuteed and consequently, the US subject area defence budget increased. Since kinfolk 11 the world has indeed changed and nowhere more than in the area of countering terrorist financing. duration the US national defense expenditure stood at near 350 million dollars in 2001, by 2005 it had reached 550 billion dollars. More than this, the US started what they called the Global state of war on Terrorism, a long and dear(p) war involving a large morsel of different countries and conducted on a orbit of different fronts, in order to start an international shinny against terrorism in the world, especially against Muslim terrorism. Although the US had of all time fought against acts of terror, after 9/11 these acts of terror were viewed from th e perspective of war and therefore didnt imply only if arrests, cap...'

No comments:

Post a Comment