Aesthetics Essay -- Art

estheticsKant defined esthetical as both, the analysis of taste and the analysis of logical cognition or intuition . Aesthesis, means sensation, the Greeks made a distinction between aesthesis autophues (natural sensation) and aesthesis epistemonike (acquired sensation). We may set up that aesthetics is both the remove of aesthetic objects and of the specific and subjective reactions of observers, readers, or audiences to the go away of art. Aesthetics is inescapably interdisciplinary and may be interpretive, prescriptive, descriptive, or a combination of these. The big, taken for granted(predicate) marvel about aesthetic pass judgment is whether it is ever really in the objects it is attributed to. This issue parallels the realism/anti-realism debates elsewhere in philosophy. Though there is small(a) reason to assume that aesthetic value will be pass water in just the say way as for example, moral value. An extreme realist would say that aesthetic values reside in an object as properties mugwump of any observers responses, and that if we make the judgment That is a bonny flower, or this painting is aesthetically good, what we say is unfeigned or pretended true if the flower or painting has the property, false if it does not. We will tend to like the object if we recognize the aesthetic value in it, but, for the realist, whether we recognize it and whether it is are two separate questions.Consequently, much work in aesthetics has gone into trying to specify the nature of aesthetic experience or aesthetic response. One factor is pleasure, satisfaction, or liking. The cooperate is experience the response we are looking for must be a way of attending to the object itself. In the case of music, it must be a response to perceived patterns of s... ...bility, however, so that a new question emerges The music all by itself somehow seems to point to, or bear out for emotions how? Aesthetics has yet to come to terms with this issue. There is a homogeneous pattern in the case of artistic deputation. In the question of what a picture depicts, what role is played by the artists intentions, and what by the interpretations which an observer may conjure up? Or does the painting itself have a meaning by standing in symbolic dealings to items in the world? If the latter, how similar, and how dissimilar are depiction and linguistic representation?. Once one starts to address problems at this level, the philosophy of art starts to touch on the nature of philosophy as a whole.Work CitedKant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgement. Trans. J. H. Bernard. Hafner program library of Classics. New York Hafner Press-Macmillan, 1951.