Just War Essay

Current events all over the globe raise questions with keep to the properness and ethics of waging by one country to another. For example, there atomic number 18 some events that force people to think, rationalize, and make a distinction betwixt fight in its traditional concept and a contend against terrorism, which makes it critical for a state to obtain information from captured terrorists in a bypass period of time (Moseley). There are international standards and agreements that set the rules with venerate to the waging of war, specifically applied in determining whether the war waged is just or not (Williams, Jr.and Caldwell).For one, there is the Geneva Convention, which deals with the noble objective of protecting Prisoners of struggle (POW) from diverse abuses (Moseley). The most popular theory dealing with the ethics, morality, or propriety of waging war is the just war theory (Moseley Williams, Jr. and Caldwell). This theory refers to referee in war, or moral sup port for war (Moseley). Just war theory has two aspects the theoretical and the historical tradition (Moseley Williams, Jr. and Caldwell).In the former, the justification and reasons behind war are discussed while in the latter, the focalize of attention revolves around the body of rules and agreements entered into by international bodies that are suppositious to be applied in times of war (Moseley). The former is besides know as jus ad bellum, while the latter is also known as jus in bello (Moseley). Both concepts are not mutually exclusive, and both deal with the morality of conduct and the decision to go into war (Moseley). These concepts take up a long history of tradition that built the rules of conduct to be observed during war (Moseley).The concept of jus in bello had been formulated due to decades, or even centuries of experience (Moseley). Thus, it must be deemed applicable, even to modern types of war experienced by the world today, like the war against terrorism. Inde ed, the war against terrorism is of a different kind from the other kinds of wars that humankind had seen (Schwartz). However, the differences, such as the alleged pressing need for information, are not enough to unconstraint standards that are designed to protect the dignity of the human person (Schwartz). oneness of the criteria of jus in bello is strict proportion of the conduct with the objective desired (Moseley). Applying this criterion to any proposal to wage war against a country or group of people, there would ultimately be the question of whether the use of force, that would needs end in the loss of thousands, if not millions of lives, would justify the achievement of various goals, such as freedom, economic independence, or national security (Schwartz). whole caboodle CitedMoseley, Alexander. Just War Theory. 2006. 10 Oct. 2007. . Schwartz, Joseph M. Misreading Islamist act of terrorism The War Against Terrorism and Just-War Theory. Metaphilosophy 35(2004) 273-302. Williams, Jr. , Robert E. and Dan Caldwell. Jus Post Bellum Just War Theory and the Principles of Just Peace. multinational Studies Perspectives 7(2006) 309-320